High+School+Math+1


 * High School Math 1: Kyle, Maggie, and Sam **

= Lesson Title: Algebra for the real world=

Evidence: not very clear on the objectives because each point had multiple goals instead of remaining focused on one point at a time. Evidence: He/she does not going into very much depth on the subject they are trying to teach in their lesson plan. Evidence: the instructional method has the students solve the problems in different ways and in the assessment they are to compare the efficiency of each method that was used Evidence: it does a good job at explaining the sequence of events and procedures for the students in the activities outline section. It’s very methodical in the way it flows from part to part.
 * Link to Lesson: http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/3757?ref=search **
 * Grade Level: 5th **
 * Evaluation Scores **
 * C: 3 **
 * Provides Clear Lesson Objectives
 * Exhibits sufficient knowledge of the subject topic/content?
 * P:4 **
 * Assessments match instructional method
 * Lesson appears to help organize and manage student behavior--Explains sequence of events and procedures for students

Evidence: no, we don’t consider calculators as a technology resource. Evidence: no, because it’s only using a calculator Evidence: none Evidence: none
 * T:1 **
 * Lesson plan incorporates at least 1 technology
 * Discusses possible limitations to technology or potential problems, as well as solutions
 * Provides clear rationale for technology choice
 * Demonstrates understanding of technology as teacher tool or student tool

Evidence: he has the groups solve problems in different way and at the end of class talks about which ones were the most efficient. Evidence: none Evidence: kind of but not really. If some of the points he made in the activity outline were more detailed we could give a better assessment of this point.
 * PCK: 3 **
 * Selects effective teaching strategies appropriate to subject domain to guide student thinking and learning
 * Demonstrates awareness of possible student misconceptions
 * Presents appropriate strategies for developing understanding of the subject content

Evidence: none, he does not use technology to present material. Evidence: unless you consider a calculator as technology that’s a no. Evidence: none
 * TPK:1 **
 * Chooses technologies enhancing approaches (teacher centered approaches) --Uses technology to present material
 * Chooses technologies enhancing student learning (student centered approaches) --Students use technology to explore content and achieve learning goals
 * Provides clear rationale for technology choice to deliver instruction

Evidence: nope. Again the calculator thing.
 * TCK: 1 **
 * Chooses appropriate technologies for subject domain (mathematics, science)

Evidence: nope
 * Link between technology and content is obvious or explicit

Evidence: appropriate use of content and pedagogy but not technology
 * TPCK: 2 **
 * Appropriately uses content, pedagogy, and technology strategies

Evidence: nope.
 * Technology enhances content objectives and instructional strategies


 * Overall evaluation of this lesson: It did not use technology at all in teaching this lesson. Other than that it was fine. **

= =